Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2012-132
Original file (2012-132.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
 

 

 
 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 
Application for the Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 
 
                                                                                BCMR Docket No. 2012-132 
 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 
  

FINAL DECISION 

 
 
This proceeding was conducted according to the provisions of section 1552 of title 10 and 
section  425  of  title  14  of  the  United  States  Code.    The  Chair  docketed  the  application  upon 
receipt of the applicant’s completed application on April 27, 2012, and subsequently prepared the 
final decision as required by 33 CFR § 52.61(c). 
 
 
appointed members who were designated to serve as the Board in this case. 
 

This  final  decision,  dated  January  18,  2013,  is  approved  and  signed  by  the  three  duly 

APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS 

 
 
 The applicant asked the Board to correct his record by changing his home of record from 
St. Clair, Michigan to Fort Myers, Florida, retroactive to January 5, 2009.  He alleged that when 
he moved to Florida, the yeoman informed him that his mailing address needed to be changed to 
Florida but not his home of record.  He stated that he followed the advice of his yeoman.   
 

The applicant stated his Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) is paid at the Michigan rate 
instead  of  the  Florida  rate.    He  stated  that  he  discovered  the  error  on  March  5,  2012.    The 
applicant submitted a 2009 W-2, showing civilian employment in the state of Florida.  He also 
submitted  a  copy  of  his  Florida  driver’s  license  and  a  copy  of  his  insurance  card  showing  a 
Florida address.   
 

VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD 

 
On  September  28,  2012,  the  Judge  Advocate  General  (JAG)  of  the  Coast  Guard 
 
submitted  an  advisory  opinion  recommending  that  the  Board  grant  alternative  relief  in 
accordance with a memorandum submitted by the Commander, Personnel Service Center (PSC).  
PSC recommended the following alternative relief: 
 

The  applicant’s  home  address  should  have  been  entered  into  “Direct Access”  to 
show [his Florida address] on February 1, 2009 to coincide with applicant’s move 

 

 

 

[to  Florida].  The applicant’s State of  Legal  Residence (for military benefits  and 
pay purposes) should have been changed from Michigan to Florida on February 1, 
2009.   
 
Changing  the  applicant’s  home  address  may  cause  differences  in  entitlements 
owed by the Coast Guard for BAH and BAS [basic allowance for subsistence].  It 
may also affect the applicant’s State of Legal Residence [for] tax earning purposes 
back through February 2009. 
 
PSC stated that according to the Personnel and Pay Procedures Manual, a home of record 
cannot be changed.  It can only be corrected.  PSC stated that based upon a review of documents 
in the applicant’s military record, the Coast Guard believes that the applicant intended to request 
[on  his  BCMR  application]  that  his  home  address  as  noted  in  “Direct  Access”  be  changed  to 
reflect his move from Michigan to Florida.  PSC stated that the applicant transferred from a duty 
station in Michigan to one in Florida on February 1, 2009, and his mailing address was changed 
to his Florida address in “Direct Access” on February 3, 2009, but his home address remained at 
the  Michigan  address.    PSC  stated  that  on  March  6,  2012,  the  applicant’s  home  address  was 
corrected to the Florida address in “Direct Access.”  PSC stated that although the applicant lived 
in Florida, he received BAH at the Michigan rate until March 6, 2012.   
 

  

 

APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD 

 
 
Coast Guard.  He agreed with the alternative relief recommended by PSC. 

On  November  4,  2012,  the  Board  received  the  applicant’s  response  to  the  views  of  the 

 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 

 

The Board makes the following findings and conclusions on the basis of the applicant's 

1.  The Board has jurisdiction concerning this matter pursuant to section 1552 of title 10 

military record and submissions, the Coast Guard's submission and applicable law: 
 
 
of the United States Code.   The application was timely. 
 
 
2.   The  Coast  Guard  admitted,  and  the  Board  agrees,  that  the  applicant’s  home  address 
and legal residence in “Direct Access” should be changed from Michigan to Florida retroactive 
to  February  1,  2009.    The  Coast  Guard  also  admitted  that  the  correction  could  result  in 
“differences in entitlements owed by the Coast Guard [to the applicant] for BAH and BAS [basic 
allowance  for subsistence].”   The Coast  Guard  also  noted that the correction could  impact  the 
applicant’s state income taxes retroactive to February 2009.  The applicant agreed with the relief 
recommended by the Coast Guard.     
 
 
 

3.  Accordingly, the applicant should have the relief recommended by the Coast Guard.   
  
 

[ORDER AND SIGNATURES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE] 

 

 

ORDER 

 

The application of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXUSCGR, for correction of his military record 
is granted.  His record shall be corrected to show that since February 1, 2009, his home address 
has been his current address in Punta Gorda, Florida, and his legal residence has been in the State 
of Florida.  The Coast Guard shall pay him any sum it owes him as a result of these corrections.   

 
No other relief is granted.   

  

 
 Philip B. Busch 

 

 

 
 Ashley A. Darbo 

 

 
 

 
 
 Dorothy J. Ulmer 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000369

    Original file (20120000369.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of: * Orders to active duty in an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) status, dated 30 November 2007 with duty location in Michigan * Orders for reassignment within Michigan, dated 14 February 2011 * Orders for reassignment to Fort Leonard Wood, MO, dated 9 March 2011 * Defense Finance And Accounting Service Form 702 (Leave and Earnings Statement) for 1-31 March 2011 * Memorandum for Record, Exception to Policy for BAH, dated 1 April 2011 with Operations Officer...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-253

    Original file (2009-253.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. In this regard, PSC stated that based on the statements provided by the applicant’s unit, the applicant was improperly counseled on his ability to sell leave upon executing an indefinite reenlistment contract and, if he had been properly counseled, he would have sold leave upon his indefinite reenlistment. However, indefinite reenlistments...

  • CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2009-089

    Original file (2009-089.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Full Spouse and child SBP coverage was automatically elected for the applicant when the pertinent Coast Guard office did not receive an SBP election certificate from the applicant prior to her retirement on September 1, 2007. PSC recommended that the applicant’s record be corrected to show that prior to her retirement, on August 28, 2007, she completed PSC 4700 and elected, with the concurrence of her spouse, not to participate in SBP coverage. The applicant states that she declined...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-120

    Original file (2009-120.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted a leave and earning statement for the period March 1 through March 31, 2007 with an amendment dated April 12, 2007, that shows that she was credited with balance at the time of discharge, first extension of an enlistment, separation from active duty, desertion, or death is considered as excess leave without regard to the authority under which the leave resulting in a minus balance was granted. However, on April 6, 2007, the PRRB ordered the applicant’s record...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2011-089

    Original file (2011-089.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated January 12, 2012, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record to show that he is not indebted to the government for over $9,000.00 resulting from an alleged overpayment on travel claims that he submitted during a period of active duty. The letter stated the following: [The applicant’s] travel debt resulted from being paid twice for the same periods of travel in 2004. The Coast Guard...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015179

    Original file (20130015179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The JFTR states that when Reserve Component (RC) Soldiers are ordered to active duty and a PCS order is not issued, BAH rate is based on the primary residence location at the time the Soldier was ordered to active duty. However, if the member is called or ordered to active duty and a PCS order is not issued, BAH/OHA rate is based (paid) on the primary residence location at the time called/ordered to active duty"; and c. there is no distinction made in the PPG or JFTR for AGR BAH when the...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2012-122

    Original file (2012-122.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated January 18, 2013, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he was reenlisted on active duty on August 20, 2011, instead of September 1, 2011. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On September 28, 2012, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) submitted an advisory opinion in which he recommended that the Board grant relief in this case by correcting the applicant’s record to show that...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2010-165

    Original file (2010-165.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx BCMR Docket No. The PSC stated that the applicant reported his HOR as being in Elmhurst, NY, upon his enlistment and that under COMDTINST M1900.4D, a DD 214 is supposed to show, as the HOR, the “address if known where member originally entered active duty without a break in service.” Because the applicant’s DD 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004737

    Original file (20120004737.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He stated: a. he is a Title 32 AGR Soldier mobilized in support of overseas contingency operations, and requests a Secretarial BAH waiver based upon his previously approved exception to policy to receive BAH at his last duty station of (Adelphi, MD, 20783) due to his command directed No/Low cost move, effective 21 April 2011, to a unit mobilizing within 12 months of his assignment on 30 August 2011; b. effective 21 April 2011, he was transferred to HHC, 29th Combat Aviation Brigade, Edgewood...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-142

    Original file (2008-142.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He stated that this was an error because Wrightwood, CA, is not his HOR, “but rather where [he] was living while stationed in the Air National Guard. CGPC stated that “[a]t the time of his original enlistment in the Coast Guard, he listed his residence as Wrightwood, CA 92397, and he was enlisted at Recruiting Office San Diego, CA.” CGPC stated that his “HOR for the Coast Guard is based upon his home at the time he enlisted in the Coast Guard.” When he enlisted in the Coast Guard, “he was...